modern vs. contemporary architecture/design


 
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Modern Living Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Turid



Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:46 am    Post subject: modern vs. contemporary architecture/design Reply with quoteFind all posts by Turid

Since moving to Philadelphia from Norway 3 years ago, I have see sleek buildings going up - and more are planned. At the same time I am told Philadelphia is very traditional with Victoran and Collonial preferences. If so, then why are builders and developers investing in the modern/contemporary?

I am working on my Theses in Interior Design which is titled "Is Philadelphia going Contemporary?". Through research I intend to find out if there is an underlying trend among Center City population to choose more modern/contemporar spaces and interiors.

However, I realize I need to define "contemporary" first. In the context of architecture and design - that is easier said than done. Contemporary is said to be "here and now". But what is that?

Could anyone please lead me in the right direction?
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
bobthebuilder



Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by bobthebuilder

"Contemporary" can never really be nailed done to a nice clean definition. In my opinion it's a lazy choice for a word. No doubt probably chosen hastily for lack of a better noun... Because of this mix-up we are in a silly position calling things contemporary -> it's like telling the highway patrol your acceleration instead of your velocity (as he writes the speeding ticket).

The same goes for "modern". What happens after modern -> "Post Modern"? And then after that -> "Really really Post Modern"? It seems unimaginative, but I guess we need to call it something... (Same goes for generation X, then gen Y, then Z, abc, 123...)

Is it better to qualify your here-and-now and say "20th Century Contemporary" instead? Or is it better to label things by the global influences of the time (like cold-war era, etc...)?

A good example can bee seen in the next few weeks. Modernism week is coming up mid-feb in Palm Springs. http://www.modernismweek.com/
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Modern Living Forum Page 1 of 1

 




Latest Posts   ·   ArchWeek Jobs Board   ·   Classifieds   ·   User Galleries   ·   Scrapbook   ·   Open 3D Gallery
 Architecture Search   by name of Building, Architect, or Place:  
Buildings     Architects     Types & Styles     Places     Models     GB Image Index     ArchWeek Library
Professional Directory   Web Directory   Competitions   Conferences   Events & Exhibits     Products     Media Kit
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Free 3D   ·   Search
© 2004-2008 Artifice, Inc. · Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Thème myApple v2.0.1 créé par myTemplate